Catalytic Reduction of Hydrazine to Ammonia

Catalytic Reduction of Hydrazine to AmmoniaRuvanthi KularatneCatalytic Reduction of Hydrazine to Ammonia The Site of Reduction in NitrogenaseAbstractThe conversion of N2 to NH3 is done mainly via anaerobic bacteria. The enzyme nitrogenase, which can be found in these anaerobic bacteria, is responsible for this conversion. Much research has been conducted in coiffe to cite the structure of the enzyme, the mechanism for the conversion, and the site of step-down. Hydrazine is a substrate and an intermediate of the nitrogenase enzyme. Hence, the drop-off of hydrazine to ammonia is used to mimic the late stages of the biological nitrogen regress. here the main focus is to identify the alloy atom to which the hydrazine molecule binds. In order to identify the binding site of N2 is Fe, a tris(thiolato)phosphine ligand, P(C6H3-3-Me3Si-2-S)33(PS3), is used as the chopine to obtain the put right(II) complex, P(Ph)4Fe(PS3)(CH3CN). Also, a substrate- jump-start and product-bound adducts , N-(Bu)4Fe(PS3)(N2H4) and N(C2H5)4Fe(PS3)(NH3) respectively, are synthesized. To determine whether the binding site is the V in vanadium nitrogenase, P(Ph)4V(PS3)(Cl) and P(Ph)4V(PS3)(Cl) PS3 = P(C6H3-5-Me-2-S)33- are synthesized.IntroductionNitrogen is an essential element in all living organisms. It is a major element in nucleotides and in amino acids which ultimately forms DNA and RNA, and proteins respectively. These are the building blocks which make up the nuclei in living organisms. The major source of nitrogen is atmospheric N2. It is a stable molecule and it has to be converted to a form which can be utilized by organisms. The natural way of nitrogen fixation is by lightening and by anaerobic bacteria, the latter existence the most prominent. Ab surface 25 % is fix by the industrial Haber process, which occurs at high temperatures and pressure, whereas the biological processes occur at ambient conditions1. During the process, N2 is converted to NH3, which is a more usab le form than N2. Nitrogen fixation by anaerobic bacteria is catalyzed by the enzyme nitrogenase.The enzyme is composed of cardinal protein subunits, a MoFe protein and a Fe protein. Studies reveal that the substrate binding and activation in the enzyme occurs at a Mo/Fe/S common snapping turtle. The structure of this molybdenum nitrogenase has been characterized by X-ray crystallography.2 The Fe protein has dickens bound MgATP molecules. During the reduction of N2, an electron from this Fe protein is transferred to the MoFe protein, which is associated with the hydrolysis of the two MgATP molecules.3 There are reports of leash forms of nitrogenase with Mo, Fe and V.4 The Fe and the V are also known as the alternative forms of nitrogenase1. The first has a V in place of Mo and the other is an all-Fe nitrogenase1. Although the structures capture been determine, the contain mechanism of the catalysis of N2 by the enzyme is still not fully understood. As a result, research is bei ng conducted to obtain the mechanistic in governing body of nitrogenase. Large number of coordination compounds has been proposed as mathematical structural or functional models for nitrogenase. Mononuclear and binuclear transition metal complexes and polynuclear Fe/Mo/S aggregates are among the suggested compounds. Hydrazine is a substrate and an intermediate of the nitrogenase enzyme. Hence, the reduction of hydrazine to ammonia is used to mimic the late stages of the biological nitrogen fixation. For the reduction of hydrazine, a proton source and an electron source is necessary (eq 1).1N2H4 + 2e + 2H+ 2NH3(1)Studies through hydrazine have suggested that the site of binding of N2 is at Fe in the MoFe-cofactor.5 However, some research also shows that the reduction site is at Mo in the MoFe-cofactor1,6 or in a VII state in vanadium nitrogenase.7 Based on electron tightness maps and X-ray crystallography, it has been found that the Fe/Mo/S cofactor has an elongated MoFe7S9 cluster which is composed of MoFe3S3 and Fe4S3 cuboidal subunits bridged by two or three sulfide ligands.1,6In order to identify the site of reduction of nitrogenase and the mechanism involved in the reduction process, much research has been carried surface by the formation of various metal complexes. Here, to see if the binding site is Fe, a tris(thiolato)phosphine ligand, P(C6H3-3-Me3Si-2-S)33(PS3), is used as the platform to obtain the iron(II) complex, P(Ph)4Fe(PS3)(CH3CN) (A).5 Also, a substrate-bound and product-bound adducts, N-(Bu)4Fe(PS3)(N2H4) (B) and N(C2H5)4Fe(PS3)(NH3) (C), are synthesized. To determine whether the binding site is the V in vanadium nitrogenase, P(Ph)4V(PS3)(Cl) (D) and P(Ph)4V(PS3)(Cl) (E) PS3 = P(C6H3-5-Me-2-S)33- are synthesized.MethodsSynthesis of P(Ph)4Fe(PS3)(CH3CN)FeCl2 was added to a solution of H3PS3 and n-BuLi in acetonitrile in the ratio of 113 respectively, to give an emerald solution. To this P(Ph)4Br in acetonitrile was added followed by ether, a nd whence the solution was placed at 30C for 3 days. This yielded an emerald crystalline cheering of P(Ph)4Fe(PS3)(CH3CN)4CH3CN(C2H5)2O.Synthesis of N-(Bu)4Fe(PS3)(N2H4)H3PS3, Li and FeCl2 was reacted in ethanol in the ratio of 131 respectively, which gave a gullible solution. It was followed by the addition of excess N2H4H2O. Then, N(Bu)4Br was added and the reaction mixture was kept at 15C for 2 days. This resulted in a green crystalline solid of N-(Bu)4Fe(PS3)(N2H4)5C2H5OH.Synthesis of N(C2H5)4Fe(PS3)(NH3)H3PS3, Li and FeCl2 was reacted in ethanol in the ratio of 131 respectively, which gave a green solution. Then it was charged with NH3 gas (1 atm) to generate an emerald solution. Then, N(C2H5)4Br was added in ethanol, and the solution was kept at 15 C for 2 days. A green crystalline solid of N(C2H5)4Fe(PS3)(NH3)3C2H5OH was obtained. All the structures were characterized by X-ray crystallography.Catalytic reactivity of P(Ph)4Fe(PS3)(CH3CN)To observe the catalytic activity, an external reductant, CoCp2 and a proton source, LutHBAr4 was used (CoCp2 = cobaltocene, LutH = 2,6-lutidinium, and Ar = 3,5-(CF3)2C6H3) and all the reactions were carried out in a N2 enivironment. First, P(Ph)4Fe(PS3)(CH3CN) and CoCp2 was dissolved in CH3CN in 11 ratio of the complex to the reductant. Then, N2H4 and LutHBAr4 were added to the solution in 112 ratio (complex hydrazine proton source). The reaction was carried out at ambient temperature for about 30 mins. Concentrated HCl was used to quench the reaction. Then, the dissolver was outback(a) by vacuum and the solid was extracted with distilled water. Finally, the insoluble residue was removed and the filtrate was taken to do ammonia analysis13 and hydrazine analysis.14Synthesis of P(Ph)4 V(PS3)(Cl) (D) and P(Ph)4 V(PS3)(Cl) (E)VCl3(THF)3 in THF, H3PS3 in methanol and Li were reacted together in a 113 ratio. This gave a deep red solution. Then, PPh4Br in CH2Cl2 was added and it was layered with pentane. Which gave a red crystalline solid of D. E was synthesized using the same procedure but using the H3PS3 ligand.Catalytic reactivity of P(Ph)4 V(PS3)(Cl) (D) and P(Ph)4 V(PS3)(Cl) (E)The catalytic reduction of hydrazine by D and E were determined using cobaltocene and 2,6-Lut.HCl, using the same procedure as for A.Results and DiscussionIt was identified from X-ray crystallographic data that the three complexes, A, B, and C were crystallized with solvent molecules. Complex A had four CH3CN molecules, B had five C2H5OH molecules and the complex C had three C2H5OH molecules. These solvent molecules filled the voids in these structures by the formation of hydrogen bonds. It was also identified that the three complexes has a five coordinate iron(II) center with a trigonal bipyramidal geometry, which was form by bonding to the PS3 ligand and to the nitrogen in each ligand (CH3CN, N2H4 and NH3 in complexes A, B, and C respectively). Complexes D and E also show a trigonal bipyramidal geometry at the vanadi um(III) center in the same manner as in A, B, and C. This can be seen in the ORTEP diagrams shown in (Figure 1).The results of the catalytic activity of A, for the reduction of hydrazine to ammonia are give by Table 1, those for D are devoted in Table 2. According to Table 1, the maximum conversion 83 % is obtained at 30 mins for the atom smasher A. For D, 83 % conversion was obtained after 24 hrs. But a conversion percentage of 90 was obtained after 48 hrs. A controlled reaction was carried out in the absence of complex A. For that reaction, only less than 5 % of hydrazine was converted to ammonia. According to eq 2, hydrazine can decompose into ammonia and nitrogen.3N2H4 4NH3 + N2(2)To interpret the amount of ammonia organize by the decomposition reaction rather than the reduction, the reactions were carried out for both A and D without using the proton and the electron source. The corresponding data for A are given in Table 3. Accordingly, the conversion to ammonia at 30 min s is only 8 % and it was 15.6 % after 1 hr. Therefore it is safe to assume that the majority of ammonia production for A is carried out by the reduction process. There was no production of ammonia for D in the absence of the proton and the electron source.Figure 1 ORTEP diagrams of (a) A4CH3CN(C2H5)2O, (b) B5C2H5OH, (c) C3C2H5OH, (d) D and (e) ETable 1 Production of ammonia by A via the catalytic process at incompatible reaction time.Time (min)N2H4 added (eq)NH3 yield (mol)NH3 yield (eq)transition (%)56.01.32 10-45.344106.01.66 10-46.655206.01.85 10-47.462306.02.50 10-410.083606.02.49 10-410.083Table 2 Production of ammonia by D via the catalytic process at different reaction time.Time (min)N2H4 added (eq)NH3 yield (mol)NH3 yield (eq)Conversion (%)1.55.05.19 x 10-52.12165.08.97 x 10-53.636125.01.48 x 10-45.959185.01.85 x 10-47.474245.02.06 x 10-48.282485.02.25 x 10-49.090Table 3 Production of ammonia for A by the decomposition of hydrazine.Time (min)N2H4 added (eq)NH3 yield (m ol)NH3 yield (eq)Conversion (%)56.09.27 10-60.374.6106.01.18 10-50.475.9206.01.35 10-50.546.8306.01.61 10-50.68.1606.03.11 10-51.215.6The isolation of the products B and C, the substrate bound and product bound complexes respectively, suggests that the catalytic reduction takes place at single iron site which is supported by the PS3 ligand. The mechanism for this can be thought as the bound CH3CN molecule in complex A is replaced by a molecule of hydrazine to give the substrate bound complex B. At this stage, the N-N bond of the bound hydrazine in the iron (II) center is not activated. Therefore, by the addition of a proton source to protonate the hydrazine molecule would allow for the bond breaking of the N-N bond. Hence the first ammonia molecule will be released and a FeIVNH2 intermediate will be form. Then, FeIVNH2 will be converted to FeIINH3 by another protonation in the presence of an external electron source. Finally, the second ammonia molecule will be released. This r eaction pathway can be shown by Scheme 1.Scheme 1 The reaction pathway for the catalytic reduction process of AThe catalytic reduction of hydrazine by E did not yield any ammonia. This implies that the bound chloride in E is not interchanged with CH3CN instead the complex dissolves in it. However this exchange takes place in D, hence the catalytic activity is visible. The reason for the differences in reactivity for these two complexes, D and E, can be accounted by the two ligands, PS3 and PS3 respectively. In PS3 ligand, there are more electron donating substituents than in the PS3 ligand. Therefore, the most electron donating ligand, PS3 ligand, will donate more electrons to V and will facilitate the replacement of the bound chloride with a CH3CN molecule. Hence, the exchange will not take place in E. Therefore the reduction of hydrazine will not take place.ConclusionIn summary, it is possible to say that Fe, in MoFe-cofactor, and V, in vanadium nitrogenase, act as the binding si te of hydrazine, an intermediate of nitrogen fixation, mimicking the late stages of the nitrogen cycle. Since both the complexes are formed in a tris(thiolato)phosphine ligand platform, the reactivity of the two complexes are comparable. Hence, by comparing the conversion percentages of the two complexes, A and D, with time, it is possible to conclude that the iron complex (A) is further more efficient than the vanadium complex (D).For further studies, this research can be extended by including Mo in both these complexes and by the formation of cubanes. This would introduce a more complex nature to the complexes and would represent the enzyme more effectively. Moreover, it is possible to compare the efficiency of Mo, by forming complex with Mo on a thiolate platform.Research ProposalTitle Proper Identification of the Site of Reduction in Nitrogenase by the Catalytic Reduction of Hydrazine to Ammonia.IntroductionThe three forms of nitrogenase with Mo, Fe and V,4 have been identified . Yet, the exact mechanism and the site of reduction is still not fully understood. Studies through hydrazine have suggested that the binding sites are at Fe in the MoFe-cofactor,5 Mo in the MoFe-cofactor1,6 or in a VII state in vanadium nitrogenase.7 There has been many debates over this topics and much research has been conducted to identify the exact metal atom on which the binding take place. No research has been conducted by including Fe-Mo and V-Fe together. If these two complexes are formed, we might be able to properly identify the site of binding of N2 in nitrogenase. The enzyme in question is bulky, which is the nature of an enzyme. Hence, to include this bulkiness in the model compounds, we can use cubanes of complex nature. Furthermore, by optimizing these complexes, we may be able to use them in the industry instead of the Haber process.GoalIdentify the proper binding site of hydrazine by including both metal atoms in the complex and to use a more complex environment t o properly mimic the catalytic activity of the enzyme.AimSynthesis of MoFe- complex and VFe-complexSynthesis of cubanes of the two mentioned complexesMethodologyFeCl2, MoCl2, H3PS3 and n-BuLi are mixed in 1126 ratio in acetonitrile. After 24 hrs, PPh4Br in acetonitrile will be added to the reaction mixture. Then, the solution will be layered by the addition of ether. Later, the solution can be kept at -30 C for about three days. This will result in a complex with Fe and Mo. To check the catalytic activity, the complex cobaltocene N2H4 LutHBAr4 in the ratio of 1212 respectively, can be used. First, the complex and cobaltocene are dissolved in acetonitrile. Then, N2H4 and LutHBAr4 in acetonitrile are added to the mixture. The reaction is carried out at ambient temperature for 30 mins. Afterwards, conc. HCl is added to quench the reaction and then the solid will be filtered and removed. Finally the filtrate will be taken and ammonia analysis and hydrazine analysis will be carried out u sing the indophenol method13 and PDMAB14 method respectively.ReferencesDemadis, K. D. Malinak, S. M. Coucouvanis, D. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 4038.Einsle, O. Tezcan, F. A. Andrade, S. L. A. Schmid, B. Yoshida, M. Howard, J. B. Rees, D. C. Science 2002, 297, 1696.Danyal, K. Inglet, B. S. Vincent, K. A. Barney, B. M. Hoffman, B. M. Armstrong, F. A. Dean, D. R. Seefeldt, L. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 13197.Malinak, S. M. Demadis, K. D. Coucouvani, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 3126.Chang, Y-H. Chan, P-M. Tsai, Y-F. Lee, G-H. Hsu, H-F. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 664.Coucouvanis, D. Mosier, P. E. Demadis, K. D. Patton, S. Malinak, S. M. Kim, C. G. Tyson, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 12193.Chu, W-C. Wu, C-C. Hsu, H-F. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 3164.Demadis, K. D. Coucouvanis, D. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 436.Demadis, K. D. Coucouvanis, D. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 3658.Palermo, R. E. Singh, R. Bashkin, J. K. Holm, R. H. J. Am. Chem.Soc. 1984, 106, 2600.Zhang, Y.-P. Bashkin, J. K. Holm, R. H . Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26, 694.Wong, G. B. Bobrik, M. A. Holm, R. H. Inorg. Chem. 1978, 17, 578.Chaney, A. L. Marbach, E. P., Clin. Chem. (Winston-Salem, N. C.) 1962, 8, 130.Haji Shabani, A. M. Dadfarnia, S. Dehghan, K., Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2004,25, 213.1